Example academic essay
Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly come in essays.
If the death penalty be restored in britain?
The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in the UK due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The reasons, effects and solutions to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime in order to increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by considering the arguments put forward by those in favour associated with the death penalty after which by looking at the arguments in opposition to the concept.
The key arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that individuals will be dissuaded from violent crime if they know they are going to face the greatest punishment and therefore people should face the exact same treatment that they gave out to others. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we have to look at the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a greater deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support to your evidence hypothesis theory.” It appears at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The concept of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is certainly a basic appeal in the easy phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it demonstrates that we undervalue the ability to live. There are various other points too meant for the death penalty, one of these being cost. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for many years at a time.
The arguments up against the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This really is an argument that is interesting could you teach children never to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead show them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There is also the fact you could execute people that are innocent. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison, but they can never be cut back through the dead. When people have been killed there is no possibility of rehabilitation or criminals attempting to make up for crimes. Because of this reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
In conclusion, the arguments put forward by individuals who support or are up against the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences plus the real way people are brought up and so are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this country most people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this instance it may be argued that parliament is in the lead in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the clear message that killing is obviously wrong.
You need to be able to note that this essay is composed of:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the topic is interesting and relevant. best essay writing
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the down sides and issues active in the topic.
3. An overview associated with essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which gives a main idea/argument which informs us what your whole paragraph is mostly about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward when you look at the sentence that is topic.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence as well as the outside sources.
Summarises the points that are main gives an answer into the question.